home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac of the 20th Century
/
TIME, Almanac of the 20th Century.ISO
/
1990
/
90
/
oct_dec
/
1108104.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-02-27
|
3KB
|
66 lines
<text>
<title>
(Nov. 08, 1990) Polls Apart
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
Nov. 08, 1990 Special Issue - Women:The Road Ahead
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
NATION, Page 18
Polls Apart
</hdr>
<body>
<p> Republican optimists murmured two autumns ago that Dan
Quayle's presence on the G.O.P. ticket might attract votes from
women beguiled by his good looks. Wrong. The presumed sex bomb
proved to be a dud on Election Day, according to NBC's exit
poll. Now women give Quayle even less support than men do. A
recent TIME survey found that only 20% of American women (vs.
30% of men) view Quayle as qualified to assume power if
something happened to George Bush. The contrast is one of many
demonstrating that a gender gap still yawns in U.S. politics.
</p>
<p> Some analysts thought that the gap between male and female
opinion would moderate with the passing of the macho Ronald
Reagan. Not so, says political scientist Ethel Klein of Columbia
University: "Women and men are now taking a different lens to
politics." What many women see through their glass is a less
hospitable vista than men perceive. Polls show, for instance,
that women are consistently more bearish on the economy than
men, often by a margin of a dozen points or more. Perhaps
because they earn less than men and have less job security, they
feel more vulnerable to hard times. Women are also more
inclined to believe government action is needed to ward off
economic threats and social problems. This makes them somewhat
more likely than men to vote Democratic. In fact, one reason
that the Reagan-Bush victories of the '80s failed to translate
into a full party realignment is that in critical Senate
contests female voters elected liberals.
</p>
<p> Women are less keen about adventures overseas. When Bush
moved troops to the Middle East this summer, 80% of American men
surveyed favored a military attack on Iraq if it invaded Saudi
Arabia; only 55% of women agreed. Nonetheless, Bush's standing
among women improved in early fall. In a recent NBC poll, female
approval of the President's job performance was just six points
below the percentage for men.
</p>
<p> Do women voters favor female candidates? The evidence on
that score is spotty. Issues seem to prevail over chromosomes
when a conservative Republican woman runs against a liberal man.
There is no debate on one statistic: women are voting in
proportion to their actual numbers, and there are several
million more of them than there are men. Thus candidates are
under pressure to spy the difference between the lenses that men
and women train on politics.
</p>
<p>By Laurence I. Barrett.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>